public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [11/19] HWPOISON: Refactor truncate to allow direct truncating of page v2
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:44:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090805144402.GD23992@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090805144112.GM11385@basil.fritz.box>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > One question I had for the others (Andrew? other mm guys?) what is the
> > feelings of merging this feature? Leaving aside exact implementation
> > and just considering the high level design and cost/benefit. Last time
> > there were some people objecting, so I wonder the situation now? So
> > does anybody need more convincing? :)
> 
> The main objection last time was that it was a bit too late in the 
> release schedule.
> 
> I can't remember anyone really questioning the basic feature itself.

I can't exactly remember. Maybe it was in a thread with Alan and/or
Arjan ;) I don't think the feature itself was questioned as much as
cost/benefit. Maybe I was wrong...

I just want to see everyone is happy with the basic idea ;)


> > Also I will just cc linux-arch. It would be interesting to know whether
> > powerpc, ia64, or s390 or others would be interested to use this feature?
> 
> ia64 is interested (but no code so far) I talked to DaveM and he seems to be 
> interested for sparc too.  I would expect other server architectures to 
> eventually use it as they get around to writing the necessary architecture 
> specific glue.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-05 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200908051136.682859934@firstfloor.org>
     [not found] ` <20090805093638.D3754B15D8@basil.firstfloor.org>
     [not found]   ` <20090805102008.GB17190@wotan.suse.de>
     [not found]     ` <20090805134607.GH11385@basil.fritz.box>
     [not found]       ` <20090805140145.GB28563@wotan.suse.de>
     [not found]         ` <20090805141001.GJ11385@basil.fritz.box>
2009-08-05 14:16           ` [PATCH] [11/19] HWPOISON: Refactor truncate to allow direct truncating of page v2 Nick Piggin
2009-08-05 14:16             ` Nick Piggin
2009-08-05 14:41             ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-05 14:44               ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-08-05 15:00               ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-08-06 11:48             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-08-06 12:04               ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090805144402.GD23992@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox