From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86 team <x86@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
Pan Jacob jun <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC patch 31/32] init: Move sched_clock_init after late_time_init
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:32:18 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090821205603.324314018@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090821205008.518392436@linutronix.de
[-- Attachment #1: init-move-sched-clock-init-after-late-time-init.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1264 bytes --]
Some architectures initialize clocks and timers in late_time_init and
x86 wants to do the same to avoid FIXMAP hackery for calibrating the
TSC. That would result in undefined sched_clock readout and wreckaged
printk timestamps again. We probably have those already on archs which
do all their time/clock setup in late_time_init.
There is no harm to move that after late_time_init except that a few
more boot timestamps are stale. The scheduler is not active at that
point so no real wreckage is expected.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
---
init/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
@@ -631,7 +631,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
softirq_init();
timekeeping_init();
time_init();
- sched_clock_init();
profile_init();
if (!irqs_disabled())
printk(KERN_CRIT "start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were "
@@ -682,6 +681,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
numa_policy_init();
if (late_time_init)
late_time_init();
+ sched_clock_init();
calibrate_delay();
pidmap_init();
anon_vma_init();
parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20090821205008.518392436@linutronix.de>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090821205603.324314018@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).