From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic sys_old_select
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:31:37 +0100
Message-ID: <20100108093137.GA28722@lst.de>
References: <20100106172112.GA17163@lst.de> <20100106173258.GJ9882@parisc-linux.org> <20100106173438.GA17660@lst.de> <20100106174109.GA30528@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:40905 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750920Ab0AHJd2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 8 Jan 2010 04:33:28 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100106174109.GA30528@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, tony.luck@intel.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org, gerg@uclinux.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, jdike@addtoit.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com

On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 05:41:09PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Actually, I'd be a lot happier if we had lib/syscall/old_select.c, instead
> of cluttering fs/select.c with that.  Objections?

If we do that let's do it consistantly for various old syscalls, not
an odd one out.