From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] generic sys_ipc wrapper Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:36:03 +0900 Message-ID: <20100202013603.GD13428@linux-sh.org> References: <20100201185544.GC11045@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 124x34x33x190.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([124.34.33.190]:52146 "EHLO master.linux-sh.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751039Ab0BBBgL (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:36:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100201185544.GC11045@lst.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, takata@linux-m32r.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org, gerg@uclinux.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, jdike@addtoit.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:55:44PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Add a generic implementation of the ipc demultiplexer syscall. Except for > s390 and sparc64 all implementations of the sys_ipc are nearly identical. > > There are slight differences in the types of the parameters, where mips > and powerpc as the only 64-bit architectures with sys_ipc use unsigned long > for the "third" argument as it gets casted to a pointer later, while it > traditionally is an "int" like most other paramters. frv goes even further > and uses unsigned long for all parameters execept for "ptr" which is a pointer > type everywhere. The change from int to unsigned long for "third" and back > to "int" for the others on frv should be fine due to the in-register calling > conventions for syscalls (we already had a similar issue with the generic > sys_ptrace), but I'd prefer to have the arch maintainers looks over this > in details. > > Except for that h8300, m68k and m68knommu lack an impplementation of the > semtimedop sub call which this patch adds, and various architectures have > different strategies for the SHMAT version 1 case which apparently never > gets used - at least on i386 it seems superflous as the compat code on > x86-64 and ia64 doesn't even bother to implement it. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > sh bits look fine, too. Acked-by: Paul Mundt