From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:36:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002021536.51928.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100201185607.GD11045@lst.de>
On Monday 01 February 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +/*
> + * Get/set the personality.
> + *
> + * Note that we simply return PER_LINUX even if we actually have a 32-bit
> + * task (PER_LINUX32) as this is expected by 32-bit userland.
> + */
> SYSCALL_DEFINE1(personality, u_long, personality)
> {
> u_long old = current->personality;
>
> if (personality != 0xffffffff) {
> + if (personality(old) == PER_LINUX32 &&
> + personality == PER_LINUX)
> + personality = PER_LINUX32;
> set_personality(personality);
> if (current->personality != personality)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return (long)old;
> + return (long)(old == PER_LINUX32 ? PER_LINUX : old);
> }
What does this do for a native 64 bit process setting PER_LINUX32?
It looks to me like it could never set it back to the original
value, or am I missing something here?
It's what the arch specific code does already, but it seems a bit
strange anyway.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 18:56 [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-01 18:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-02 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-02-02 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-03 17:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-02-03 17:13 ` David Miller
2010-02-03 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 7:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-02-04 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-05 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-09 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-09 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002021536.51928.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).