From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:55:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20100310.135525.214295069.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1268256267-3769-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1268256267-3769-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <20100310215018.GD24353@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49525 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932769Ab0CJVzF (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:55:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100310215018.GD24353@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org From: Russell King Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:50:18 +0000 > Where are patches 1 to 4? They were x86 specific, from the perspective of your architecture you only need to look at the non-x86 parts of patch #5