From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100321.210023.209981130.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1269155601-18247-7-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1269225435.8599.70.camel@pasglop> <4BA6EA62.1030603@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56943 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753714Ab0CVEAB (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BA6EA62.1030603@kernel.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: yinghai@kernel.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org You really aren't listening to us at all. We told you a thousand times to investigate using LMB for all of this. Instead you are posting the sparc64 conversion to the e820 stuff again. That action means you absolutely don't value our feedback at all. You seem to really not care what a mess you are (unnecessarily) making.