From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -v2 4/4] x86: use lmb to replace early_res Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:14:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20100323091436.GA4576@elte.hu> References: <1269333587-1866-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1269333587-1866-5-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:35901 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751872Ab0CWJO4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:14:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1269333587-1866-5-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > still keep kernel/early_res.c for the extension. > > should move those file to lib/lmb.c later? > > -v2: fix NO_BOOTMEM hang with printk Would be nice to track known TODO items - that way people dont feel that you are ignoring (or have missed) their feedback. For example are the list of 4 improvements i suggested in the previous mail planned, or do you disagree with some of that? Thanks, Ingo