From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:52:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20100331135220.c6695a51.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20100325194100.GA2364@debian> <20100331134048.da4e35a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4BB3B4DB.7040904@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:45879 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752990Ab0CaVH5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:07:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BB3B4DB.7040904@kernel.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Rabin Vincent , lkml , hpa@zytor.com, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, cl@linux-foundation.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:47:23 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote: > spin_unlock_irq from arm is different from other archs? No, spin_unlock_irq() unconditionally enables interrupts on all architectures.