linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	acme@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock()
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:27:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100407112707.GA5143@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100406133141.039454288@chello.nl>

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since we can call cpu_clock() from NMI context fix up the IRQ
> disabling to conform to the new rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_clock.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
>  	unsigned long long clock;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	local_irq_save_nmi(flags);
>  	clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	local_irq_restore_nmi(flags);
>  
>  	return clock;
>  }


That seem to add a small overhead in various places.
Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi == local_irq_save
for archs that have native nmi?

Or cpu_clock_nmi()?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-07 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-06 13:28 [patch 0/3] IRQ disable vs NMI Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` [patch 1/3] kernel: local_irq_{save,restore}_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07  1:13   ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-07  1:19     ` David Miller
2010-04-07  1:23       ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-07  1:23         ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-06 13:28 ` [patch 2/3] perf: Use local_irq_save_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock() Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07 11:27   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-04-07 11:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07 11:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07 11:44       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06 17:54 ` [patch 0/3] IRQ disable vs NMI David Miller
2010-04-06 17:54   ` David Miller
2010-04-06 23:39 ` David Miller
2010-04-06 23:39   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100407112707.GA5143@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).