From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Archs <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG perf] perf_fetch_caller_regs / rewind_frame_pointer can panic
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:59:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100408105913.GE5247@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270720640.2215.43.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:57:20AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Hello
>
> Current linux-2.6 tree panics on my dev machine
>
> 64 bit kernel, 32bit user land
> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y
>
> perf timechart record &
>
> Instant crash
>
> Call Trace:
> perf_trace_sched_switch+0xd5/0x120
> schedule+0x6b5/0x860
> retint_careful+0xd/0x21
>
> RIP ffffffff81010955 perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs+0x15/0x40
> CR2: 00000000d21f1422
>
>
> rewind_frame_pointer() is probably wrong.
>
> No test performed to check frame is in current stack, or
> that (!user_mode_vm(regs))
user_mode_vm() can not work here as we are actually filling
regs from scratch.
But we indeed need to have a safe dereference to avoid such
crashes. A simple probe_kernel_address() should do the trick.
This API is going to change for the next cycle as it won't need
to rewind further than the first caller. So I'm going to do a
rough probe_kernel_address() fix for the current version. The next
one won't have this problem.
>
>
> static inline unsigned long rewind_frame_pointer(int n)
> {
> struct stack_frame *frame;
>
> get_bp(frame);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> while (n--)
> frame = frame->next_frame;
> #endif
>
> return (unsigned long)frame;
> }
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-08 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 1:52 [PATCH 0/7] perf updates and fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 1:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 1:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf: Move perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs into a macro Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 1:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 1:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf: Make perf_fetch_caller_regs rewind to the first caller only Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 1:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-08 9:57 ` [BUG perf] perf_fetch_caller_regs / rewind_frame_pointer can panic Eric Dumazet
2010-04-08 10:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH] perf: Fix unsafe frame rewinding with hot regs fetching Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-08 13:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-08 17:31 ` [GIT PULL] perf fix Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-13 22:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-26 6:02 ` [PATCH 0/7] perf updates and fixes Paul Mackerras
2010-03-26 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-26 17:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 17:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100408105913.GE5247@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).