linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] mm: Revalidate anon_vma in page_lock_anon_vma()
Date: Fri,  9 Apr 2010 16:29:59 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100409160252.80E6.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100409154730.e9945cbc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

> On Fri,  9 Apr 2010 15:34:33 +0900 (JST)
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:16:41 +1000
> > > Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:17:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > There is nothing preventing the anon_vma from being detached while we
> > > > > are spinning to acquire the lock. Most (all?) current users end up
> > > > > calling something like vma_address(page, vma) on it, which has a
> > > > > fairly good chance of weeding out wonky vmas.
> > > > > 
> > > > > However suppose the anon_vma got freed and re-used while we were
> > > > > waiting to acquire the lock, and the new anon_vma fits with the
> > > > > page->index (because that is the only thing vma_address() uses to
> > > > > determine if the page fits in a particular vma, we could end up
> > > > > traversing faulty anon_vma chains.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Close this hole for good by re-validating that page->mapping still
> > > > > holds the very same anon_vma pointer after we acquire the lock, if not
> > > > > be utterly paranoid and retry the whole operation (which will very
> > > > > likely bail, because it's unlikely the page got attached to a different
> > > > > anon_vma in the meantime).
> > > > 
> > > > Hm, looks like a bugfix? How was this supposed to be safe?
> > > > 
> > > IIUC.
> > > 
> > > Before Rik's change to anon_vma, once page->mapping is set as anon_vma | 0x1,
> > > it's not modified until the page is freed.
> > > After the patch, do_wp_page() overwrite page->mapping when it reuse existing
> > > page.
> > 
> > Why?
> > IIUC. page->mapping dereference in page_lock_anon_vma() makes four story.
> > 
> > 1. the anon_vma is valid
> > 	-> do page_referenced_one(). 
> > 2. the anon_vma is invalid and freed to buddy
> > 	-> bail out by page_mapped(), no touch anon_vma
> > 3. the anon_vma is kfreed, and not reused
> > 	-> bail out by page_mapped()
> > 4. the anon_vma is kfreed, but reused as another anon_vma
> > 	-> bail out by page_check_address()
> > 
> > Now we have to consider 5th story.
> > 
> > 5. the anon_vma is exchanged another anon_vma by do_wp_page.
> > 	-> bail out by above bailing out stuff.
> > 
> > 
> > I agree peter's patch makes sense. but I don't think Rik's patch change
> > locking rule.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, I think following.
> 
> Assume a page is ANON and SwapCache, and it has only one reference.
> Consider it's read-only mapped and cause do_wp_page().
> page_mapcount(page) == 1 here.
> 
>     CPU0                          CPU1
> 
> 1. do_wp_page()
> 2. .....
> 3. replace anon_vma.     anon_vma = lock_page_anon_vma()
> 
> So, lock_page_anon_vma() may have lock on wrong anon_vma, here.(mapcount=1)
> 
> 4. modify pte to writable.        do something...
> 
> After lock, in CPU1, a pte of estimated address by vma_address(vma, page)
> containes pfn of the page and page_check_address() will success.
> 
> I'm not sure how this is dangerouns.
> But it's possible that CPU1 cannot notice there was anon_vma replacement.
> And modifies pte withoug holding anon vma's lock which the code believes
> it's holded.


Hehe, page_referenced() already can take unstable VM_LOCKED value. So,
In worst case we make false positive pageout, but it's not disaster.
I think. Anyway "use after free" don't happen by this blutal code.

However, I think you pointed one good thing. before Rik patch, we don't have
page->mapping reassignment. then, we didn't need rcu_dereference().
but now it can happen. so, I think rcu_dereference() is better.

Perhaps, I'm missing something.


diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 8b088f0..b4a0b5b 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ struct anon_vma *page_lock_anon_vma(struct page *page)
 	unsigned long anon_mapping;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	anon_mapping = (unsigned long) ACCESS_ONCE(page->mapping);
+	anon_mapping = (unsigned long) rcu_dereference(page->mapping);
 	if ((anon_mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS) != PAGE_MAPPING_ANON)
 		goto out;
 	if (!page_mapped(page))

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-09  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-08 19:17 [PATCH 00/13] mm: preemptibility -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] powerpc: Add rcu_read_lock() to gup_fast() implementation Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 20:31   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-09  3:11   ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-13  1:05   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-13  3:43     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 13:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-15 14:28         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-16  6:54           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-16 13:43             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-16 23:25               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-16 23:25                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-16 13:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-16 14:17             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-16 14:17               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-16 14:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-16 14:32                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-16 14:56                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-16 15:09                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-16 15:14                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-16 16:45                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-16 19:37                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-16 20:28                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-18  3:06                           ` James Bottomley
2010-04-18 13:55                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-18 18:55                               ` James Bottomley
2010-04-16  6:51       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-16  8:18         ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-16  8:29           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-16  9:22             ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] mm: Revalidate anon_vma in page_lock_anon_vma() Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 20:50   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-08 21:20   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-08 21:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 21:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  2:19       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-09  2:19   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-09  3:16   ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-09  4:56     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-09  6:34       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-09  6:47         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-09  7:29           ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-04-09  7:57             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-09  8:03               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-09  8:24                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-09  8:01             ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-09  8:17               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-09 14:41                 ` mlock and pageout race? Minchan Kim
2010-04-09  8:44             ` [PATCH 02/13] mm: Revalidate anon_vma in page_lock_anon_vma() Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24 19:32               ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-25  9:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25  9:01                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09 12:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86: Remove last traces of quicklist usage Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 20:51   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] mm: Move anon_vma ref out from under CONFIG_KSM Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09 12:35   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] mm: Make use of the anon_vma ref count Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  7:04   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-09  7:04     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-09  9:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] mm: Preemptible mmu_gather Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  3:25   ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-09  8:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09 20:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 19:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 07/13] powerpc: " Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  4:07   ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-09  8:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  8:14       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  8:46       ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-09  9:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-13  2:06       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-13  1:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-13  1:23   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-13 10:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 13:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 13:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 13:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 13:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] sparc: " Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] mm, powerpc: Move the RCU page-table freeing into generic code Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  3:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-09  8:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] lockdep, mutex: Provide mutex_lock_nest_lock Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09 15:36   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] mutex: Provide mutex_is_contended Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09 15:37   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] mm: Convert i_mmap_lock and anon_vma->lock to mutexes Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17 ` [PATCH 13/13] mm: Optimize page_lock_anon_vma Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-08 22:18   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  8:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09 19:22       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 19:22         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-08 20:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] mm: preemptibility -v2 David Miller
2010-04-08 20:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  1:00   ` David Miller
2010-04-09  4:14 ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-09  8:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  8:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  8:50     ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-09  8:58       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  8:58 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-04-09  9:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-09  9:03 ` David Howells
2010-04-09  9:22   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100409160252.80E6.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).