From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: dvomlehn@cisco.com, to@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
maint_arch@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/23] Make register values available to panic notifiers
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:58:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100414.165851.144419620.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28376.1271289134@redhat.com>
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:52:14 +0100
> David VomLehn <dvomlehn@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> > Can the use of va_start() clobber lots of registers, thereby rendering the
>> > exercise pointless on some arches?
>> >
>>
>> The implementations I'm familiar with only need one or two registers. What
>> it *does* do is to force the contents of registers being used to pass
>> argument values onto the stack. This is roughly what gcc does for asm()
>> statements when you tell it registers are clobbered.
>
> How about something like Sparc, where you can pass up to 8 arguments (if I
> remember correctly) in registers. I'm not sure how Sparc handles varargs
> functions, though.
6 arguments, and all arguments get popped onto the stack into the
argument save area when doing varargs so you can access them as an
array.
Stack looks like:
struct register_window window;
unsigned long args[...];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-14 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-12 6:06 [PATCH 1/23] Make register values available to panic notifiers David VomLehn
2010-04-12 6:06 ` David VomLehn
2010-04-12 6:24 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-04-12 11:16 ` David Howells
2010-04-14 20:41 ` David VomLehn
2010-04-14 20:42 ` David VomLehn
2010-04-14 23:52 ` David Howells
2010-04-14 23:58 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-04-12 12:03 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-04-12 12:24 ` Russell King
2010-04-12 12:24 ` Russell King
2010-04-14 20:47 ` David VomLehn
2010-04-12 12:20 ` David Howells
2010-04-12 12:27 ` Russell King
2010-04-12 13:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-04-14 21:09 ` David VomLehn
2010-04-14 21:00 ` David VomLehn
2010-04-12 12:45 ` David Howells
2010-04-14 21:04 ` David VomLehn
2010-04-15 2:54 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100414.165851.144419620.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvomlehn@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maint_arch@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net \
--cc=to@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).