linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memory barrier question
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:12:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100917231222.GA3060@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284760148.30449.107.camel@pasglop>

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 07:49:08AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > Right but in the concrete namei example I can't see how a compiler
> > optimization can make a difference.  The order of the loads is quite
> > clear:
> > 
> >    LOAD inode = next.dentry->inode
> >    if (inode != NULL)
> >    	LOAD inode->f_op
> > 
> > What is there the compiler can optimize?
> 
> Those two loads depend on each other, I don't think any implementation
> can re-order them. In fact, such data dependency is typically what is
> used to avoid having barriers in some cases. The second load cannot be
> issued until the value from the first one is returned.

Sufficiently sadistic compiler and CPU implementations could do value
speculation, for example, driven by profile-feedback optimization.
Then the guess might initially incorrect, but then a store by some other
CPU could make the subsequent test decide (wrongly) that the guess had
in fact been correct.

Needless to say, I am not a fan of value speculation.  But other people
do like it a lot.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-17 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-15 14:36 memory barrier question Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-15 14:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-15 19:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-16 11:55 ` David Howells
2010-09-16 13:42   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 13:42     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 14:30     ` David Howells
2010-09-16 15:03       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 15:03         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 16:06         ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 16:06           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 16:37           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 16:56             ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 17:09               ` James Bottomley
2010-09-16 17:17                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 17:40                   ` James Bottomley
2010-09-17 21:49                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-17 23:12                     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-09-19  2:47                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-19 15:26                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-19 20:15                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-19 21:59                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20  0:58                               ` James Bottomley
2010-09-20  1:29                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 16:01                                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-20 18:25                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 18:57                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 20:26                                       ` Michael Cree
2010-09-20 20:40                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-21 14:59                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-22 18:41                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-18  1:12                     ` Alan Cox
2010-09-16 16:50           ` Jamie Lokier
2010-09-16 16:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-16 17:59     ` David Howells
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-20 10:34 George Spelvin
2010-09-20 10:34 ` George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100917231222.GA3060@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).