From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memory barrier question
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:59:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100919215909.GG3060@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1OxQIg-0005Nw-WE@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:15:51PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Give it a few years. There are reportedly already other compilers that do
> > this, which is not too surprising given that the perception of insanity
> > is limited to lockless parallel code. If you have single-threaded code,
> > such as code and data under a lock (where the data is never accessed
> > without holding that lock), then this sort of optimization is pretty safe.
> > I still don't like it, but the compiler guys would argue that this is
> > because I am one of those insane parallel-programming guys.
> >
> > Furthermore, there are other ways to get into trouble. If the code
> > continued as follows:
> >
> > LOAD inode = next.dentry->inode
> > if (inode != NULL)
> > LOAD inode->f_op
> > do_something_using_lots_of_registers();
> > LOAD inode->some_other_field
> >
> > and if the code expected ->f_op and ->some_other_field to be from the
> > same inode structure, severe disappointment could ensue. This is because
> > the compiler is within its rights to reload from next.dentry->inode,
> > especially given register pressure. In fact, the compiler would be within
> > its rights to reload from next.dentry->inode in the "LOAD inode->f_op"
> > statement. And it might well get NULL from such a reload.
>
> Except the VFS doesn't allow that. dentry->inode can go from NULL to
> non-NULL anytime but will only go from non-NULL to NULL when there are
> no possible external references to the dentry.
>
> The compiler and the CPU cannot move the "LOAD inode->some_field"
> before the "LOAD dentry->inode", because of the conditional, right?
Other than Alpha, the CPU cannot. The standard -does- permit the
compiler to guess the value of the pointer, thus effectively moving the
load prior to the conditional. At present, as far as I know, gcc does
not actually do this.
Again, please put at least an ACCESS_ONCE() in. Trivial to do now,
possibly saving much pain and headache later on.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-19 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-15 14:36 memory barrier question Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-15 14:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-15 19:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-16 11:55 ` David Howells
2010-09-16 13:42 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 13:42 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 14:30 ` David Howells
2010-09-16 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 16:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 16:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 16:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 16:56 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 17:09 ` James Bottomley
2010-09-16 17:17 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 17:40 ` James Bottomley
2010-09-17 21:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-17 23:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-19 2:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-19 15:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-19 20:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-19 21:59 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-09-20 0:58 ` James Bottomley
2010-09-20 1:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 16:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-20 18:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 18:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 20:26 ` Michael Cree
2010-09-20 20:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-21 14:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-22 18:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-18 1:12 ` Alan Cox
2010-09-16 16:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-09-16 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-16 17:59 ` David Howells
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-20 10:34 George Spelvin
2010-09-20 10:34 ` George Spelvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100919215909.GG3060@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).