linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memory barrier question
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:59:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100919215909.GG3060@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1OxQIg-0005Nw-WE@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:15:51PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Give it a few years.  There are reportedly already other compilers that do
> > this, which is not too surprising given that the perception of insanity
> > is limited to lockless parallel code.  If you have single-threaded code,
> > such as code and data under a lock (where the data is never accessed
> > without holding that lock), then this sort of optimization is pretty safe.
> > I still don't like it, but the compiler guys would argue that this is
> > because I am one of those insane parallel-programming guys.
> > 
> > Furthermore, there are other ways to get into trouble.  If the code
> > continued as follows:
> > 
> >    LOAD inode = next.dentry->inode
> >    if (inode != NULL)
> >    	LOAD inode->f_op
> > 	do_something_using_lots_of_registers();
> > 	LOAD inode->some_other_field
> > 
> > and if the code expected ->f_op and ->some_other_field to be from the
> > same inode structure, severe disappointment could ensue.  This is because
> > the compiler is within its rights to reload from next.dentry->inode,
> > especially given register pressure.  In fact, the compiler would be within
> > its rights to reload from next.dentry->inode in the "LOAD inode->f_op"
> > statement.  And it might well get NULL from such a reload.
> 
> Except the VFS doesn't allow that.  dentry->inode can go from NULL to
> non-NULL anytime but will only go from non-NULL to NULL when there are
> no possible external references to the dentry.
> 
> The compiler and the CPU cannot move the "LOAD inode->some_field"
> before the "LOAD dentry->inode", because of the conditional, right?

Other than Alpha, the CPU cannot.  The standard -does- permit the
compiler to guess the value of the pointer, thus effectively moving the
load prior to the conditional.  At present, as far as I know, gcc does
not actually do this.

Again, please put at least an ACCESS_ONCE() in.  Trivial to do now,
possibly saving much pain and headache later on.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-19 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-15 14:36 memory barrier question Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-15 14:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-15 19:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-16 11:55 ` David Howells
2010-09-16 13:42   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 13:42     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 14:30     ` David Howells
2010-09-16 15:03       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 15:03         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 16:06         ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 16:06           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 16:37           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-16 16:56             ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 17:09               ` James Bottomley
2010-09-16 17:17                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-16 17:40                   ` James Bottomley
2010-09-17 21:49                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-17 23:12                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-19  2:47                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-19 15:26                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-19 20:15                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-19 21:59                             ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-09-20  0:58                               ` James Bottomley
2010-09-20  1:29                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 16:01                                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-20 18:25                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 18:57                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-20 20:26                                       ` Michael Cree
2010-09-20 20:40                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-21 14:59                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-22 18:41                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-18  1:12                     ` Alan Cox
2010-09-16 16:50           ` Jamie Lokier
2010-09-16 16:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-16 17:59     ` David Howells
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-20 10:34 George Spelvin
2010-09-20 10:34 ` George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100919215909.GG3060@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).