From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] sh: oprofile: Use perf-events oprofile backend Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:09:25 +0900 Message-ID: <20101011110925.GB1155@linux-sh.org> References: <20101011110654.GR13563@erda.amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 124x34x33x190.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([124.34.33.190]:36011 "EHLO master.linux-sh.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752487Ab0JKLJf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:09:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101011110654.GR13563@erda.amd.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Robert Richter Cc: Matt Fleming , Will Deacon , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Deng-Cheng Zhu , Grant Likely On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:06:54PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > Matt and Paul, > > are those (upper case) cpu_type strings already supported by the > oprofile userland? > I've only ever used out-of-tree patches with it due to the generally volatile nature of support. Now that we have a more consistent interface to go through, it probably makes sense to get those bits merged, too. We're certainly not tied down to any ABI at this point.