From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: situation with signals Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:30:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20101027233012.GJ19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20100923221141.GK19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <9lYpY1#WLHA.1516@exchange1.tad.internal.tilera.com> <4CC89352.7020808@tilera.com> <20101027213745.GI19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4CC8ACE0.1040407@tilera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:38036 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751737Ab0J0XaP (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:30:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC8ACE0.1040407@tilera.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Chris Metcalf Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:51:12PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > BTW, is everything in your pt_regs safe to modify? > > What an interesting observation. :-) In fact, it would be possible to > overwrite the privilege level (the ex1 register) from within the signal > handler and then return to run arbitrary code at kernel PL. I'll fix it. Then you need to be careful with that in your ptrace as well (POKEUSR and SETREGS).