public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	sam@ravnborg.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3]use new macros for x86 percpu readmostly section
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:32:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101209143201.6ab0a49d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291255350.12777.117.camel@sli10-conroe>

On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:02:30 +0800
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:

> Use the new macros to correctly align percpu readmostly data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S	2010-12-02 09:48:44.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S	2010-12-02 09:54:24.000000000 +0800
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ SECTIONS
>  	 * output PHDR, so the next output section - .init.text - should
>  	 * start another segment - init.
>  	 */
> -	PERCPU_VADDR(0, :percpu)
> +	PERCPU_VADDR_CACHEALIGNED(0, :percpu, INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES)
>  #endif
>  
>  	INIT_TEXT_SECTION(PAGE_SIZE)
> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ SECTIONS
>  	}
>  
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> -	PERCPU(THREAD_SIZE)
> +	PERCPU_CACHEALIGNED(THREAD_SIZE, INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES)
>  #endif
>  
>  	. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
> 

So what is the situation now with all other architectures?  Should they
be changed to correctly align their read-mostly percpu areas?

If so, what should the arch maintainers do to achieve this?

       reply	other threads:[~2010-12-09 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1291255350.12777.117.camel@sli10-conroe>
2010-12-09 22:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-12-10  0:21   ` [patch 3/3]use new macros for x86 percpu readmostly section Shaohua Li
2010-12-10  0:21     ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101209143201.6ab0a49d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox