From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: + kthread-numa-aware-kthread_create_on_cpu.patch added to -mm tree Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:07:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20110119120756.cd554fb1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <201012100044.oBA0ivp3016990@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <1293131522.2170.798.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:50925 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752671Ab1ASUIx (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:08:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1293131522.2170.798.camel@laptop> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, ak@linux.intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, tj@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:12:02 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 16:44 -0800, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > +struct task_struct *kthread_create_on_cpu(int (*threadfn)(void *data), > > + void *data, > > + int cpu, > > + const char namefmt[], > > + ...) > > I thought it was agreed that name sucked too much to live? I agreed ;) > All other *_on_cpu() interfaces actually do stuff on that cpu, but this > does not in fact create a cpu affine task. The patches are stuck in my tree awaiting some movement here..