From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: + kthread-numa-aware-kthread_create_on_cpu.patch added to -mm tree Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:17:16 -0800 Message-ID: <20110119201716.GH22288@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <201012100044.oBA0ivp3016990@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <1293131522.2170.798.camel@laptop> <20110119120756.cd554fb1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1295468119.2653.2.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:60284 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752024Ab1ASURN (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:17:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295468119.2653.2.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, tj@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com > > I wont discuss about a function _name_ Andrew. > > If nobody can chose one better than the one I chosed, what can I do ? kthread_create_node() would seem logical (with a node parameter) -Andi