From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:26:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20110207132623.GH10564@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1297081335-13631-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:34523 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752252Ab1BGN03 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:26:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Alan Stern , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Which means that (for now) I don't have to care that CONFIG_PM becomes > unclearable. Other people may care, though... The whole point of the patch is that (other than the IA64 emulator which explicitly requires that CONFIG_PM be disabled) I strongly suspect that nobody is actually using this configuration except as a result of randconfig type testing.