From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/75] genirq: Overhaul for 2.6.39
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:59:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110211135906.GA16358@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102111359580.31804@localhost6.localdomain6>
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> B1;2401;0cOn Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So yes, it's net more source lines, but not resulting in any binary
> > bloat.
>
> Just checked. When the compat layer goes away it will kill about 500
> lines. So it's less code with better encapsulation.
>
> Once all genirq archs convert to the generic irq_show_interrupts(),
> this will kill another 1000+ lines.
So while this is the first step:
> 29 files changed, 1353 insertions(+), 899 deletions(-)
It turns into this end result (mockup):
> 129 files changed, 1353 insertions(+), 2400 deletions(-)
Right? Or, more likely, considering all the surrounding code changes, something
like:
> 129 files changed, 4353 insertions(+), 5400 deletions(-)
Did I get the file count right - roughtly how many files are affected throughout all
architectures? The changes are massively intrusive and widely spread out so we
cannot do them in one go, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-10 23:35 [patch 00/75] genirq: Overhaul for 2.6.39 Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-10 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-11 0:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-11 0:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-11 0:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-11 13:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-11 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-02-11 14:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-11 14:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-13 12:50 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-02-14 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-11 4:03 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110211135906.GA16358@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox