From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch 00/75] genirq: Overhaul for 2.6.39 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:59:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20110211135906.GA16358@elte.hu> References: <20110210222908.661199947@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:57101 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756214Ab1BKN7V (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:59:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linus Torvalds , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > B1;2401;0cOn Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So yes, it's net more source lines, but not resulting in any binary > > bloat. >=20 > Just checked. When the compat layer goes away it will kill about 500 > lines. So it's less code with better encapsulation. >=20 > Once all genirq archs convert to the generic irq_show_interrupts(), > this will kill another 1000+ lines. So while this is the first step: > =A029 files changed, 1353 insertions(+), 899 deletions(-) It turns into this end result (mockup): > =A0129 files changed, 1353 insertions(+), 2400 deletions(-) Right? Or, more likely, considering all the surrounding code changes, s= omething=20 like: > =A0129 files changed, 4353 insertions(+), 5400 deletions(-) Did I get the file count right - roughtly how many files are affected t= hroughout all=20 architectures? The changes are massively intrusive and widely spread ou= t so we=20 cannot do them in one go, right? Thanks, Ingo