public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	'Greg KH' <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] unicore32 machine related files: hardware registers
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:42:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102181142.42614.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00e901cbcf51$8507c290$8f1747b0$@mprc.pku.edu.cn>

On Friday 18 February 2011 10:52:12 Guan Xuetao wrote:

> > On Wednesday 16 February 2011, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> > > +#define io_p2v(x)      ((x) - PKUNITY_IOSPACE_BASE)
> > > +#define io_v2p(x)      ((x) + PKUNITY_IOSPACE_BASE)
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > > +
> > > +# define __REG(x)      (*((volatile unsigned long *)io_p2v(x)))
> > > +# define __PREG(x)     (io_v2p((unsigned long)&(x)))
> > > +
> > > +#else
> > > +
> > > +# define __REG(x)      io_p2v(x)
> > > +# define __PREG(x)     io_v2p(x)
> > 
> > > #define PKUNITY_IOSPACE_BASE            0x80000000 /* 0x80000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF 2GB */
> > 
> > The typecasts look wrong here:
> > 
> > - "volatile unsigned long*" is not the right pointer type to do I/O on. It
> >   should instead be "void __iomem *". Please use the "sparse" tool with "make C=1"
> >   to get warnings about incorrect pointer type accesses.
> __REG() macro could be used in both left and right sides of assignment sentence.
> This idea is borrowed from arm/sa1100.
>
> When used in left side, __REG is a register port, and when used in right side, 
> __REG is just the value of the register.
> It is a trick, but very useful. I'd like to remain the macros.
 
Ok, I didn't realize this. However, this is a really bad idea
and I would strongly advise removing this throughout the code.

The only way we do MMIO accesses in Linux is through the
readl()/writel() functions. On many architectures, these
contain more than just a pointer dereference, and if you
need that, you can change it in just one place.

Things that can go wrong with volatile pointer dereferences include:

* compiler turns 32 bit access into four 8-bit accesses
* I/O bus reorders access and it moves outside of a spinlock
* non-volatile accesses to system RAM get reordered around
  MMIO access, which may break if the MMIO triggers a DMA.

> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/mach/PKUnity.h b/arch/unicore32/include/mach/PKUnity.h
> index 1e13208..39f27f4 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/mach/PKUnity.h
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/mach/PKUnity.h
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>   * Memory Definitions
>   */
>  #define PKUNITY_SDRAM_BASE		0x00000000 /* 0x00000000 - 0x7FFFFFFF 2GB */
> -#define PKUNITY_IOSPACE_BASE            0x80000000 /* 0x80000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF 2GB */
> +#define PKUNITY_MMIO_BASE		0x80000000 /* 0x80000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF 2GB */
>  #define PKUNITY_PCI_BASE		0x80000000 /* 0x80000000 - 0xBFFFFFFF 1GB */
>  #include "regs-pci.h"
>  #define PKUNITY_BOOT_ROM2_BASE		0xF4000000 /* 0xF4000000 - 0xF7FFFFFF 64MB */

This change is ok.

> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/mach/hardware.h b/arch/unicore32/include/mach/hardware.h
> index 3fb7236..ebce7de 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/mach/hardware.h
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/mach/hardware.h
> @@ -17,19 +17,14 @@
>  
>  #include "PKUnity.h"
>  
> -#define io_p2v(x)	((x) - PKUNITY_IOSPACE_BASE)
> -#define io_v2p(x)	((x) + PKUNITY_IOSPACE_BASE)
> +#define io_p2v(x)	((x) - PKUNITY_MMIO_BASE)
> +#define io_v2p(x)	((x) + PKUNITY_MMIO_BASE)
>
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__

The result of io_p2v really needs to be a (void __iomem *) pointer, not
an integer, so the accesses can work.

>  # define __REG(x)	(*((volatile unsigned long *)io_p2v(x)))
>  # define __PREG(x)	(io_v2p((unsigned long)&(x)))

And as explained, these should be removed and all users converted to
use readl()/writel().

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-18 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-16  7:51 [PATCH 09/12] unicore32 machine related files: hardware registers Guan Xuetao
2011-02-17 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-18  9:52   ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-18 10:42     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-02-22 14:09       ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-22 14:19         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-22 14:19           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-26 12:23           ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-26 13:16             ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-27  3:35               ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-27 17:15                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-27 17:15                   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102181142.42614.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox