linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
	Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:02:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110222070240.GA21765@dtor-ws.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimyaA+JdBHekm69R5Y2A2DEdPdndFLrKJAaz=vt@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 06:03:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > The only sane thing I can see is make sure that such structures that
> > we put into sections "arrays" like that are naturally aligned with
> > padding.
> 
> The sad part is, that assuming I read the gcc sources correctly (see
> the earlier emails where David pointed to it), that alignment is:
>  - architecture-specific
>  - depends on the size of the structure
>  - seems to depend on the version of gcc itself.
> 
> The _one_ safe case is likely to be "structure size is a power of
> two". And it does look like using a pointer is going to be safe, not
> only because the gcc auto-alignment only triggers for things like
> structs/unions/arrays, but because at least the x86 code only does it
> if the structure was bigger than the alignment size itself.
> 
> So using pointer indirection is likely to be safe. It's still ugly and
> annoying as heck, though.
> 

Regardless the approach we'll take I think the following patch is also
needed (for cris architecture). I am not sure why __param section is
inly defined for one specific subarch but I they need __param they'll
need __modev as well.

Thanks,

Dmitry

From a567280f900c15891a55e7ea4e2919b38e1d1a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:12:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] cris: add missing __modver section

Commit e94965ed5beb23c6fabf7ed31f625e66d7ff28de added a new __modver
section to store module version information for drivers built into the
kernel, but missed the fact that cris does some additional steps to
set up sections.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
---
 arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 4422189..fae1b7b 100644
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ SECTIONS
 	.init.data : { INIT_DATA }
 	.init.setup : { INIT_SETUP(16) }
 #ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_ARCH_V32
+	__start___modver = .;
+	__modver : { *(__modver) }
+	__stop___modver = .;
+
 	__start___param = .;
 	__param : { *(__param) }
 	__stop___param = .;
-- 
1.7.3.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-22  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-08  0:02 [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08  0:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module parameters Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08  0:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] module: do not hide __modver_version_show declaration behind ifdef Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-08 21:12   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-17 12:43   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-17 12:43     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module parameters Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-13 23:04   ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-13 23:04     ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-17 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 17:24   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 17:31   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 17:31     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 17:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 17:45       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 18:00       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 18:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 18:06           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 21:01           ` David Miller
2011-02-17 21:01             ` David Miller
2011-02-17 21:11             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 21:17               ` David Miller
2011-02-17 21:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 22:01                   ` David Miller
2011-02-17 22:19                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 22:23                       ` David Miller
2011-02-17 22:23                         ` David Miller
2011-02-17 22:48                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 22:48                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 23:08                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 23:19                             ` David Miller
2011-02-19  0:14                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-21  4:00                               ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-21  4:00                                 ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-21  7:38                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-21  7:49                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-21  7:49                                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-21 13:25                                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-21 13:25                                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-22  1:58                                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-22  1:58                                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-22  2:03                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-22  2:03                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-22  7:02                                     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2011-02-22 17:08                                       ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-02-22 20:47                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-22 20:47                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-23 15:00                                           ` Jesper Nilsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110222070240.GA21765@dtor-ws.eng.vmware.com \
    --to=dtor@vmware.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=starvik@axis.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).