public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	'Greg KH' <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] unicore32 machine related files: hardware registers
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:16:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102261416.10050.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010f01cbd5b0$09980830$1cc81890$@mprc.pku.edu.cn>

On Saturday 26 February 2011, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> > >  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > >
> > > -# define __REG(x)      (*((volatile unsigned long *)io_p2v(x)))
> > > -# define __PREG(x)     (io_v2p((unsigned long)&(x)))
> > > +# define __REG(x)      (void __iomem *)io_p2v(x)
> > 
> > The patch looks correct, but if you make the the definition for
> > PKUNITY_MMIO_BASE contain the cast to (void __iomem *), you no
> > longer need another cast.
>
> Because the io_p2v(x) calculate x and PKUNITY_IOSPACE_BASE,
> all registers should be added with (void __iomem *).
> So I prefer to remain the previous patch.

The problem with the definition of io_p2v is that it gives you
an type that is impossible to use correctly, except in assembly
code. Linux assumes that MMIO registers in virtual space
are __iomem pointers, and we like that to be consistent.

If you have a function that returns a virtual address, it should
really have the same type as any other function that uses a virtual
address.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-26 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-16  7:51 [PATCH 09/12] unicore32 machine related files: hardware registers Guan Xuetao
2011-02-17 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-18  9:52   ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-18 10:42     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-22 14:09       ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-22 14:19         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-22 14:19           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-26 12:23           ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-26 13:16             ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-02-27  3:35               ` Guan Xuetao
2011-02-27 17:15                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-27 17:15                   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102261416.10050.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox