From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] asm-generic/mutex-dec.h: add SMP support
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:23:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110606142301.c0a570da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306725568-10922-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>
On Sun, 29 May 2011 23:19:28 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> To make these guys work on SMP systems, we just need to sprinkle a few
> barriers around.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> ---
> note: this is what the Blackfin SMP port is using, but it doesn't seem
> like other SMP ports are ... so I wonder if we're just trying too hard
> and these barriers aren't actually necessary ?
>
> include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h | 8 +++++++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h
> index f104af7..e746c3c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> {
> if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
> fail_fn(count);
> + else
> + smp_mb();
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -39,6 +41,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> {
> if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
> return fail_fn(count);
> + smp_mb();
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -58,6 +61,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> static inline void
> __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> {
> + smp_mb();
> if (unlikely(atomic_inc_return(count) <= 0))
> fail_fn(count);
> }
> @@ -82,8 +86,10 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> static inline int
> __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> {
> - if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
> + if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1)) {
> + smp_mb();
> return 1;
> + }
> return 0;
> }
This patch basically reverts Nick's a8ddac7e53e89cb ("mutex: speed up
generic mutex implementations"). What's up with that?
I could try to review this patch but I'm pathetic with barriers. Help.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 3:19 [PATCH/RFC] asm-generic/mutex-dec.h: add SMP support Mike Frysinger
2011-05-30 7:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-06 21:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-06-06 21:31 ` [uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-06-06 22:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-06 21:32 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110606142301.c0a570da.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).