From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@dave
Cc: mingo@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range()
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:43:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110728094322.GG2622@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311694534-5161-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
From bf27dffdabf7c4c3cd4be14d14ff9e2ba8ecbc0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:57:00 +0200
__memblock_remove()'s open coded region manipulation can be trivially
replaced with memlbock_islate_range(). This increases code sharing
and eases improving region tracking.
This pulls memblock_isolate_range() out of HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP.
Make it use memblock_get_region_node() instead of assuming rgn->nid is
available.
-v2: Fixed build failure on !HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP caused by direct
rgn->nid access.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
Updated to fix build breakage on !HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. This
doesn't affect patches on top of it. Updated git branch available.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git memblock
Commit ID should be 46c66825fc9a398f06f72732ed1a9d4fe89f6805. If
anyone wants full re-post of the series, please let me know.
Thanks.
mm/memblock.c | 56 +++++++++-----------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index a64d469..fc6dce2 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
return memblock_add_region(&memblock.memory, base, size);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
/**
* memblock_isolate_range - isolate given range into disjoint memblocks
* @type: memblock type to isolate range for
@@ -449,7 +448,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
rgn->base = base;
rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
memblock_insert_region(type, i, rbase, base - rbase,
- rgn->nid);
+ memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else if (rend > end) {
/*
* @rgn intersects from above. Split and redo the
@@ -458,7 +457,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
rgn->base = end;
rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
memblock_insert_region(type, i--, rbase, end - rbase,
- rgn->nid);
+ memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else {
/* @rgn is fully contained, record it */
if (!*end_rgn)
@@ -469,56 +468,19 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
return 0;
}
-#endif
static int __init_memblock __memblock_remove(struct memblock_type *type,
phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
- phys_addr_t end = base + size;
- int i;
-
- /* Walk through the array for collisions */
- for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) {
- struct memblock_region *rgn = &type->regions[i];
- phys_addr_t rend = rgn->base + rgn->size;
-
- /* Nothing more to do, exit */
- if (rgn->base > end || rgn->size == 0)
- break;
-
- /* If we fully enclose the block, drop it */
- if (base <= rgn->base && end >= rend) {
- memblock_remove_region(type, i--);
- continue;
- }
-
- /* If we are fully enclosed within a block
- * then we need to split it and we are done
- */
- if (base > rgn->base && end < rend) {
- rgn->size = base - rgn->base;
- if (!memblock_add_region(type, end, rend - end))
- return 0;
- /* Failure to split is bad, we at least
- * restore the block before erroring
- */
- rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
- WARN_ON(1);
- return -1;
- }
-
- /* Check if we need to trim the bottom of a block */
- if (rgn->base < end && rend > end) {
- rgn->size -= end - rgn->base;
- rgn->base = end;
- break;
- }
+ int start_rgn, end_rgn;
+ int i, ret;
- /* And check if we need to trim the top of a block */
- if (base < rend)
- rgn->size -= rend - base;
+ ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, base, size, &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- }
+ for (i = end_rgn - 1; i >= start_rgn; i--)
+ memblock_remove_region(type, i);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.6
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range()
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:43:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110728094322.GG2622@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20110728094322.MJ9wpS2oSYNwhcCQ9FOse0MWON6HOZxK7O-t7dC9FVw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311694534-5161-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
From bf27dffdabf7c4c3cd4be14d14ff9e2ba8ecbc0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:57:00 +0200
__memblock_remove()'s open coded region manipulation can be trivially
replaced with memlbock_islate_range(). This increases code sharing
and eases improving region tracking.
This pulls memblock_isolate_range() out of HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP.
Make it use memblock_get_region_node() instead of assuming rgn->nid is
available.
-v2: Fixed build failure on !HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP caused by direct
rgn->nid access.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
Updated to fix build breakage on !HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. This
doesn't affect patches on top of it. Updated git branch available.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git memblock
Commit ID should be 46c66825fc9a398f06f72732ed1a9d4fe89f6805. If
anyone wants full re-post of the series, please let me know.
Thanks.
mm/memblock.c | 56 +++++++++-----------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index a64d469..fc6dce2 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
return memblock_add_region(&memblock.memory, base, size);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
/**
* memblock_isolate_range - isolate given range into disjoint memblocks
* @type: memblock type to isolate range for
@@ -449,7 +448,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
rgn->base = base;
rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
memblock_insert_region(type, i, rbase, base - rbase,
- rgn->nid);
+ memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else if (rend > end) {
/*
* @rgn intersects from above. Split and redo the
@@ -458,7 +457,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
rgn->base = end;
rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
memblock_insert_region(type, i--, rbase, end - rbase,
- rgn->nid);
+ memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else {
/* @rgn is fully contained, record it */
if (!*end_rgn)
@@ -469,56 +468,19 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
return 0;
}
-#endif
static int __init_memblock __memblock_remove(struct memblock_type *type,
phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
- phys_addr_t end = base + size;
- int i;
-
- /* Walk through the array for collisions */
- for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) {
- struct memblock_region *rgn = &type->regions[i];
- phys_addr_t rend = rgn->base + rgn->size;
-
- /* Nothing more to do, exit */
- if (rgn->base > end || rgn->size == 0)
- break;
-
- /* If we fully enclose the block, drop it */
- if (base <= rgn->base && end >= rend) {
- memblock_remove_region(type, i--);
- continue;
- }
-
- /* If we are fully enclosed within a block
- * then we need to split it and we are done
- */
- if (base > rgn->base && end < rend) {
- rgn->size = base - rgn->base;
- if (!memblock_add_region(type, end, rend - end))
- return 0;
- /* Failure to split is bad, we at least
- * restore the block before erroring
- */
- rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
- WARN_ON(1);
- return -1;
- }
-
- /* Check if we need to trim the bottom of a block */
- if (rgn->base < end && rend > end) {
- rgn->size -= end - rgn->base;
- rgn->base = end;
- break;
- }
+ int start_rgn, end_rgn;
+ int i, ret;
- /* And check if we need to trim the top of a block */
- if (base < rend)
- rgn->size -= rend - base;
+ ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, base, size, &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- }
+ for (i = end_rgn - 1; i >= start_rgn; i--)
+ memblock_remove_region(type, i);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-26 15:35 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 01/23] memblock: Make memblock_overlaps_region() static Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 02/23] memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update prototypes Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 03/23] memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functions Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 04/23] memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 05/23] memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arrays Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 07/23] memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-28 9:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-28 9:43 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 09/23] memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @size Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 10/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 13/23] memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update users Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 14/23] memblock: Implement memblock_add_node() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 15/23] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 16/23] sparc: " Tejun Heo
2011-08-04 9:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-04 9:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-04 10:13 ` David Miller
2011-08-04 10:13 ` David Miller
2011-08-08 12:30 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-08-08 12:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH " Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: " Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 18/23] ia64: " Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 19/23] mips: " Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-03 16:17 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-08-03 16:17 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-08-03 16:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: " Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 21/23] score: " Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 22/23] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-08 12:32 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-08-08 12:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 23/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 21:14 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Yinghai Lu
2011-07-26 21:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 22:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 9:41 ` [PATCH 0.5/23] memblock: Fix include breakages caused by 24aa07882b Tejun Heo
2011-07-28 9:41 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-18 12:00 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-08-18 12:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-18 21:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-18 21:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110728094322.GG2622@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@dave \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).