From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/11] omap3isp: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:10:02 +0200 Message-ID: <201108011310.02626.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> References: <1311760070-21532-1-git-send-email-sven@narfation.org> <201107311700.43515.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <1518031.UNu44UiQdf@sven-laptop.home.narfation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1518031.UNu44UiQdf@sven-laptop.home.narfation.org> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sven Eckelmann Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Hi Sven, On Monday 01 August 2011 12:07:15 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Sunday 31 July 2011 17:00:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 July 2011 11:47:44 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through > > > to provide the functionality of > > > atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > > I'll queue this to my tree for v3.2. Please let me know if you would > > rather push the patch through another tree. > > The problem is that until now no one from linux-arch has applied the patch > 01/11 in his tree (which is needed before this patch can be applied) and > you tree have to be based on the "yet to be chosen linux-arch tree". > Otherwise your tree will just break and not be acceptable for a pull > request. > > Maybe it is easier when one person applies 01-11 after 02-11 was Acked-by > the responsible maintainers. > > 02 is more or less automatically Acked-by us :) > 04, 09 and 10 are also Acked. > ... and the rest is waiting for actions. OK. I'm fine with 05/11 being pushed through any tree with my ack. Please let me know if/when you want me to apply it to my tree. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:33595 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751565Ab1HALJ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 07:09:58 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/11] omap3isp: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:10:02 +0200 References: <1311760070-21532-1-git-send-email-sven@narfation.org> <201107311700.43515.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <1518031.UNu44UiQdf@sven-laptop.home.narfation.org> In-Reply-To: <1518031.UNu44UiQdf@sven-laptop.home.narfation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201108011310.02626.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sven Eckelmann Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20110801111002.eX1ylDS5qSiz6G8dJbBBOGqxfPPc8Fj-KfOyS0qP7oE@z> Hi Sven, On Monday 01 August 2011 12:07:15 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Sunday 31 July 2011 17:00:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 July 2011 11:47:44 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through > > > to provide the functionality of > > > atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > > I'll queue this to my tree for v3.2. Please let me know if you would > > rather push the patch through another tree. > > The problem is that until now no one from linux-arch has applied the patch > 01/11 in his tree (which is needed before this patch can be applied) and > you tree have to be based on the "yet to be chosen linux-arch tree". > Otherwise your tree will just break and not be acceptable for a pull > request. > > Maybe it is easier when one person applies 01-11 after 02-11 was Acked-by > the responsible maintainers. > > 02 is more or less automatically Acked-by us :) > 04, 09 and 10 are also Acked. > ... and the rest is waiting for actions. OK. I'm fine with 05/11 being pushed through any tree with my ack. Please let me know if/when you want me to apply it to my tree. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart