From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/24] C6X: specific board support
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 19:04:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108091904.43047.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312839879-13592-23-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com>
On Monday 08 August 2011, Mark Salter wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/c6x/platforms/board-dsk6455.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/c6x/platforms/board-evm6457.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/c6x/platforms/board-evm6472.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/c6x/platforms/board-evm6474.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
I would argue that none of these should exist. When you have device tree probing,
you should be able to do all the initialization according to the device tree contents.
>
>+ c6455_setup_arch();
>+
>+ /* CPLD */
>+ emif_config_ce(2, EMIFA_CFG_ASYNC |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_WIDTH_8);
>+
>+ /* NOR Flash */
>+ emif_config_ce(3, EMIFA_CFG_ASYNC |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_WIDTH_8);
>+
>+ /* Daughter Card */
>+ emif_config_ce(4, EMIFA_CFG_ASYNC |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_WIDTH_32);
>+
>+ /* Daughter Card */
>+ emif_config_ce(5, EMIFA_CFG_ASYNC |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_W_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_SETUP(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_STROBE(10) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_R_HOLD(1) |
>+ EMIFA_CFG_WIDTH_32);
>+
>+ /* Raise priority of waiting bus commands after 255 transfers */
>+ emif_set_burst_prio(255);
This code definitely needs more explanation. Why is this all done in Linux instead of
the boot loader? If it's device specific, why not do it in the device driver?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-09 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-08 21:44 [PATCH 00/24] C6X: New architecture patch set Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 01/24] fix default __strnlen_user macro Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 02/24] fixed generic page.h for non-zero PAGE_OFFSET Mark Salter
2011-08-09 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 03/24] add ELF machine define for TI C6X DSPs Mark Salter
2011-08-09 15:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 04/24] C6X: build infrastructure Mark Salter
2011-08-09 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-09 15:56 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-09 19:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 05/24] C6X: early boot code Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-09 19:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 06/24] C6X: devicetree Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 07/24] C6X: memory management Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-17 13:26 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-17 13:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 08/24] C6X: process management Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 09/24] C6X: signal management Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 10/24] C6X: time management Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-17 13:15 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-17 13:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 11/24] C6X: interrupt handling Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 12/24] C6X: syscalls Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 13/24] C6X: traps Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 14/24] C6X: clocks Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 15/24] C6X: cache control Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-09 17:03 ` David Howells
2011-08-10 9:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 16/24] C6X: module support Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 17/24] C6X: ptrace support Mark Salter
2011-08-09 16:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 18/24] C6X: headers Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 19/24] C6X: library code Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 20/24] C6X: general machine and SoC support Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 21/24] C6X: specific " Mark Salter
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 22/24] C6X: specific board support Mark Salter
2011-08-09 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-08-09 17:16 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-10 14:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 23/24] C6X: miscellaneous low-level SoC support Mark Salter
2011-08-09 17:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-08 21:44 ` [PATCH 24/24] C6X: MAINTAINERS Mark Salter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108091904.43047.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).