From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yong Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/57] dirvers/parisc: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:07:24 +0800 Message-ID: <20110921120724.GA2550@zhy> References: <1316597339-29861-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1316597339-29861-41-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1316599624.2966.12.camel@dabdike> Reply-To: Yong Zhang Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:36346 "EHLO mail-pz0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752778Ab1IUMHe (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:07:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1316599624.2966.12.camel@dabdike> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Kyle McMartin , Helge Deller , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:07:04PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > Firstly, we don't need 57 patches doing this ... a single one through > the trivial tree should be sufficient (and it can nuke the flag at the > same time). > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 17:28 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > > Since commit [c58543c8: genirq: Run irq handlers with interrupts disabled], > > um, that's commit e58aa3d2d0cc01ad8d6f7f640a0670433f794922 Ah, yes, not sure how I make it wrong. Thanks, Yong