From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Linas Vepstas (Code Aurora)" Subject: Re: [patch v3 19/36] Hexagon: Add ptrace support Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:50:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20110921175009.GA3703@codeaurora.org> References: <20110909010847.294039464@codeaurora.org> <201109101229.58445.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110919152505.GB6830@codeaurora.org> <201109211715.20795.pedro@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109211715.20795.pedro@codesourcery.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pedro Alves Cc: Jonas Bonn , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:15:20PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:29:57PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > Yes, the x86/x86-64 ports or gdb and gdbserver are already > > > using GET/SETREGSET even. Thanks; after a bit of initial confusion, I've gotten gdb to work with this, so I'm happy. > I wish there was an equivalent of PTRACE_GETREGSET for siginfo... How? Why? -- Linas -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:44242 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811Ab1IURuP (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:50:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:50:09 -0500 From: "Linas Vepstas (Code Aurora)" Subject: Re: [patch v3 19/36] Hexagon: Add ptrace support Message-ID: <20110921175009.GA3703@codeaurora.org> References: <20110909010847.294039464@codeaurora.org> <201109101229.58445.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110919152505.GB6830@codeaurora.org> <201109211715.20795.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109211715.20795.pedro@codesourcery.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Pedro Alves Cc: Jonas Bonn , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de Message-ID: <20110921175009.hKXQewsy9YZkJ4znH3ZCN0QJgPtHk5kxdlLFj1fXWt0@z> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:15:20PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:29:57PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > Yes, the x86/x86-64 ports or gdb and gdbserver are already > > > using GET/SETREGSET even. Thanks; after a bit of initial confusion, I've gotten gdb to work with this, so I'm happy. > I wish there was an equivalent of PTRACE_GETREGSET for siginfo... How? Why? -- Linas -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.