From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/24] C6X: build infrastructure Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:57:59 +0200 Message-ID: <201109281657.59636.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1317155405-26235-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <201109281523.15680.arnd@arndb.de> <1317220372.2580.68.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1317220372.2580.68.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Salter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Mark Salter wrote: > > Also, how different are these boards and socs still? Since you are > > based on device trees for hardware configuration, do you actually > > need the options at all? > > The BOARD configs can go. The SOC configs will go out when clkdev > stuff gets reworked when generic clock bindings are available. > Ok, sounds good. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64393 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754415Ab1I1O6C (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:58:02 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/24] C6X: build infrastructure Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:57:59 +0200 References: <1317155405-26235-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <201109281523.15680.arnd@arndb.de> <1317220372.2580.68.camel@deneb.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1317220372.2580.68.camel@deneb.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201109281657.59636.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Salter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20110928145759.A0UVY0eG0Nh5fTDxXuo3EoUOGNhYhvvYqgx93eHfoXE@z> On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Mark Salter wrote: > > Also, how different are these boards and socs still? Since you are > > based on device trees for hardware configuration, do you actually > > need the options at all? > > The BOARD configs can go. The SOC configs will go out when clkdev > stuff gets reworked when generic clock bindings are available. > Ok, sounds good. Arnd