From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Please include const-sections into linux-next Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:35:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20111016033514.GC26654@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20111013233818.GB26654@one.firstfloor.org> <1318631204.3018.101.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:56155 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751972Ab1JPDfV (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:35:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318631204.3018.101.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: Andi Kleen , Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org > I have no idea why, though. Thanks for testing. Yes it's hard to tell with plain gcc (before 4.7) I have a special gcc patch to tell me the other symbol :) Usually it's because some other symbol is wrong. In this case it must be in the same translation unit. Can you please do make mm/percpu.i on that build and send me the percpu.i in private email? Thanks, -Andi