Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> (cc'ing Stephen, hi!)
> 
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 05:31:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > This patchset was posted quite a while ago but got lost during the
> > > korg disturbance and I forgot about it too.  Thankfully, benh pinged
> > > me about testing this patchset yesterday, so here's the refreshed
> > > version.
> > 
> > A bit scary - you should get it into linux-next i suspect - if 
> > that works out then we could then put it into tip:core/memblock 
> > if there are no objections from anyone.
> > 
> > It's not really an x86 tree and most of the changes are 
> > affecting non-x86 architectures, right?
> 
> Hmmm... this was part of the memblock updates going through
> x86/memblock and unless we're gonna setup a separate tree for memblock
> (I don't think that would be necessary at this point) I think it would
> be better to route this x86/memblock eventually.  That said, setting
> up temp linux-next branch for now sounds fine to me.  hpa, what do you
> think?

I'm fine with routing this through -tip - the branch can be 
tip:core/memblock as this is really not just an x86 series - but 
if you could pre-test all the arch impact in linux-next that 
would be great ...

Thanks,

	Ingo