From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:26:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20111205172618.GA23387@elte.hu> References: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20111205163148.GA25909@elte.hu> <20111205171209.GA627@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:57514 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932523Ab1LER2O (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:28:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111205171209.GA627@google.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se, lennox.wu@gmail.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au * Tejun Heo wrote: > (cc'ing Stephen, hi!) > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 05:31:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patchset was posted quite a while ago but got lost during the > > > korg disturbance and I forgot about it too. Thankfully, benh pinged > > > me about testing this patchset yesterday, so here's the refreshed > > > version. > > > > A bit scary - you should get it into linux-next i suspect - if > > that works out then we could then put it into tip:core/memblock > > if there are no objections from anyone. > > > > It's not really an x86 tree and most of the changes are > > affecting non-x86 architectures, right? > > Hmmm... this was part of the memblock updates going through > x86/memblock and unless we're gonna setup a separate tree for memblock > (I don't think that would be necessary at this point) I think it would > be better to route this x86/memblock eventually. That said, setting > up temp linux-next branch for now sounds fine to me. hpa, what do you > think? I'm fine with routing this through -tip - the branch can be tip:core/memblock as this is really not just an x86 series - but if you could pre-test all the arch impact in linux-next that would be great ... Thanks, Ingo