From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] slab fixes for 3.2-rc4 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:47:10 -0800 Message-ID: <20111222184710.GJ17084@google.com> References: <20111220162315.GC10752@google.com> <20111220202854.GH10752@google.com> <20111221170535.GB9213@google.com> <20111222160822.GE17084@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:55938 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998Ab1LVSrQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:47:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Linus Torvalds , Pekka Enberg , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:58:51AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Subject: [percpu] Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants > > We simply say that regular this_cpu use must be safe regardless of preemption > and interrupt state. That has no material change for x86 and s390 implementations > of this_cpu operations. However, arches that do not provide their own implementation > for this_cpu operations will now get code generated that disables interrupts > instead of preemption. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter Applied to wq/for-3.3. Thanks. -- tejun