From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: why doesn't x86_32 have the accept4() syscall? Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:36:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20120109.133640.1785167474272651414.davem@davemloft.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:36210 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755486Ab2AIVgn (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:36:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Because accept4() has been provided via the sys_socketcall() indirect operation, for this socket system call and several others the native direct syscalls were never added to the x86 32-bit table and probably never will be.