linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jamie@shareable.org
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why doesn't x86_32 have the accept4() syscall?
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:07:24 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120110.120724.178373558788579377.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120110160317.GC7180@jl-vm1.vm.bytemark.co.uk>

From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:03:17 +0000

> Is there any reason why it was added via sys_socketcall() - isn't that
> just a waste of a few cycles and kernel size, compared with a direct
> pointer in the syscall table?

Looks like an oversight, but one for which I don't think is worth
correcting.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-10 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-09 21:26 why doesn't x86_32 have the accept4() syscall? Tony Luck
2012-01-09 21:36 ` David Miller
2012-01-10 16:03   ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-10 17:00     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-01-10 20:07     ` David Miller [this message]
2012-01-12  0:33 ` Michael Cree

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120110.120724.178373558788579377.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).