From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [uml-devel] /sys/class/tty/tty0/active? Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:08:38 -0800 Message-ID: <20120127010838.GA27899@suse.de> References: <58311.79.160.186.248.1327615864.squirrel@www.nlc.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33358 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751800Ab2A0BKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:10:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Kay Sievers , richard -rw- weinberger Cc: stian@nixia.no, LKML , Linux-Arch , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:56:50PM +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote= : > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:12 PM, richard -rw- weinberger > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:11 PM, =A0 wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> systemd goes nuts on UML. > >>> While hunting down all issues I found out that systemd wants to r= ead from > >>> /sys/class/tty/tty0/active. > >> > >> Kernel version? > > > > Linus' tree as of today. >=20 > Hmm, fbc92a34 introduced it. > But it depends on CONFIG_VT. :-\ Is that a problem for UML somehow?