From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 39/39] x86, PCI: kill busn in acpi pci_root_info Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:27:43 -0800 Message-ID: <20120229162743.49d78c21@jbarnes-x220> References: <1330556858-11768-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1330556858-11768-40-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <20120229235128.GA5484@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253]:33439 "HELO oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756920Ab2CAA14 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:27:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120229235128.GA5484@kroah.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Greg KH Cc: Yinghai Lu , Bjorn Helgaas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Tony Luck , David Miller , x86 , Dominik Brodowski , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:51:28 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 03:37:53PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Bjorn Helgaas > > > You just *added* this stuff in a prior patch that hasn't been > > > merged yet. =C2=A0Why can't you just fix that series rather than = doing > > > the add/remove churn? > >=20 > > as i said before, I'm not quite sure about the life cycle about > > that object. I thought Bjorn figured that out for you in the last thread? > >=20 > > still need to wait some months to verify that on system that does > > support pci root bus hot plug etc. > >=20 > > or we can just this patch for now. >=20 > A statement like that would cause all of these patches to be instantl= y > deleted from any queue that I had control over, and I strongly > recommend that Jesse just ignore them all. >=20 > If you don't know this thing, then you have no right to change it, > flat out. Why do we trust these patches from you? I sure don't. Oh don't worry, this patch set isn't going upstream anytime soon. Bjorn has raised several good points that Yinghai has yet to address... I trust Bjorn's judgment on these, so until he's happy I likely won't be merging them.