From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Kuo Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/35] Disintegrate asm/system.h for Hexagon [ver #2] Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:31:02 -0500 Message-ID: <20120313163102.GB31083@codeaurora.org> References: <201203130916.15118.arnd@arndb.de> <20120312233602.13888.27659.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20120312233747.13888.75605.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <27808.1331632900@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:21031 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755015Ab2CMQbU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:31:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27808.1331632900@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Howells Cc: Arnd Bergmann , paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:01:40AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Looking at this example, it could easily use the asm-generic versions of > > switch_to.h and barrier.h, but that would complicate the dependency chain > > again. > > Yep. The plan is to throw more patches on to the end of the series to > consolidate those. > > In fact, I wonder if we still really need the switch_to() macro wrapper, or > whether we could replace it with an function, inline or otherwise, that > returns the macro's third argument. > Alrighty... well, let me test this patch as is, and if I can, I'll see if I can change over to the generic versions of switch_to.h and barrier.h as well. Thanks, Richard Kuo -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.