linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:19:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120426231942.GJ6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120426183742.GA324@redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:37:42PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> b4b620b87fd2f388cf4c13fea21f31bed7c9a1b0 new helper: sigsuspend()
> 
> Looks obviously correct but I do not understand this chunk in kernel.c,
> 
> 	+ #ifndef __ARCH_HAS_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
> 	+ /**
> 	+  *  sys_rt_sigsuspend - replace the signal mask for a value with the
> 	+
> 	 #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
> 
> So this checks the (never used/defined?) __ARCH_HAS_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
> but comments out __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND. Looks like a typo.

	Buggered manual cherry-pick - earlier there was a patch inverting
__ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND (only mips did _not_ have it after the
whole series, and only because it has sys_rt_sigsuspend() of its own
with unusual prototype).  I ended up dropping it and mishandled conflict
resolution.  Fixed.

> 6b78370886e4f61187404b7737a831281bde35e8 xtensa: switch to generic rt_sigsuspend(2)
> and
> d978bf9dd41728dd60fe2269493fe8f21d28eef3 h8300: switch to saved_sigmask-based sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend
> 
> (off-topic, but do_signal()->try_to_freeze() looks unneeded and wrong)

Yes, get_signal_to_deliver() will do it.  I'd killed some instances in the
last round of signal fixes (2010), but never got around to doing that for
all architectures.

> 	+       /* If there's no signal to deliver, we just restore the saved mask.  */
> 	+       if (test_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK)) {
> 	+               clear_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK);
> 	+               sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &current->saved_sigmask, NULL);
> 			^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> set_current_blocked(&current->saved_sigmask) looks better.

In principle, yes.  FWIW, I think that the entire thing should be a helper
to go along with set_restore_sigmask().  With
	if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK))
		set_current_blocked(&current->saved_sigmask);
as default implementation.  The only question is where should it go -
asm/thread_info.h is not a good place due to header dependencies.
Kinda-sorta solution - in thread_info.h
{set,clear,test,test_and_clear}_restore_sigmask()
and in linux/signal.h
#ifdef HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK
static inline void restore_saved_sigmask(void)
{
	if (test_and_clear_restore_sigmask())
		set_current_blocked(&current->saved_mask);
}
static inline sigset_t *sigmask_to_save(void)
{
	struct sigset *res = &current->blocked;
	if (unlikely(test_restore_sigmask()))
		res = current->saved_sigmask;
	return res;
}
#endif

Speaking of other helpers, pulling ppc restore_sigmask() into signal.h
(as static inline) might be a good idea.  Every sigreturn instance is
open-coding it...  We need saner names, though; this set is too easy to
confuse with each other.

> f1fcb14721b4f1e65387d4563311f15f0bd33684 alpha: tidy signal delivery up
> 
> Everything looks fine, but I have the off-topic question. The changelog
> says:
> 
> 	* checking for TIF_SIGPENDING is enough; set_restart_sigmask() sets this
> 	one as well.
> 
> Agreed, but why set_restore_sigmask() sets TIF_SIGPENDING? It should be
> never used without signal_pending() == T.

Umm...  Probably, and as far as I can see all callers are only reached if
we have SIGPENDING, but that requires at least documenting what's going on.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-26 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120420004303.GB6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
     [not found] ` <CA+55aFxQR8g3TycW7nOVjjnnsaWWW-Gh74-bV6rUm+7SRTm25g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <20120420025438.GD6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
     [not found]     ` <CA+55aFzinX_6DVvDTyxrsP6VEHVY2Q+Y=e+qksnAjR+oT3GZew@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <20120420080914.GF6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
     [not found]         ` <CA+55aFxia+u3VAf0qN-2wv7DyAQZK-Z8=n=cqUvo--+C905aFg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <20120420160848.GG6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
     [not found]             ` <20120420164239.GH6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
     [not found]               ` <CA+55aFzuTspDyyLaOA-g-dTWydaUeeWo9uVGR+rZ=ZJzPW_Ocw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20120420180748.GI6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2012-04-23 18:01                   ` [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such Al Viro
2012-04-23 18:01                     ` Al Viro
2012-04-23 18:37                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-24  7:26                     ` Al Viro
2012-04-25  3:06                       ` Al Viro
2012-04-25  3:06                         ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 12:37                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 12:50                           ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 13:03                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 13:32                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 13:32                               ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 14:52                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 15:46                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 16:10                                     ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 17:02                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 17:51                                         ` Al Viro
2012-04-26  7:15                                           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26  7:25                                             ` David Miller
2012-04-26 13:52                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 14:31                                               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26 14:31                                                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26 13:22                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 18:37                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 23:19                         ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-04-27 17:24                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-27 17:24                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-27 17:54                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-02 10:37                               ` Matt Fleming
2012-05-02 14:14                                 ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 14:14                                   ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 18:45                             ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 19:14                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-27 19:34                                 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 22:51                                   ` Al Viro
2012-04-30  6:39                                     ` Greg Ungerer
2012-04-27 19:42                               ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 20:20                               ` Roland McGrath
2012-04-27 21:12                                 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 21:27                                   ` Roland McGrath
2012-04-27 23:15                                     ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 23:32                                       ` Al Viro
2012-04-29  4:12                                         ` Al Viro
2012-04-29  4:12                                           ` Al Viro
2012-04-30  8:06                                           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-27 23:50                                       ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 18:51                                         ` [PATCH] arch/tile: avoid calling do_signal() after fork from a kernel thread Chris Metcalf
2012-04-28 20:55                                           ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 20:55                                             ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 21:46                                             ` Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29  0:55                                               ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 18:51                                                 ` [PATCH v2] arch/tile: fix up some issues in calling do_work_pending() Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29  3:49                                                 ` [PATCH] arch/tile: avoid calling do_signal() after fork from a kernel thread Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29  3:49                                                   ` Chris Metcalf
2012-04-28  2:42                                       ` [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such Al Viro
2012-04-28  3:32                                         ` Al Viro
2012-04-28  3:36                                           ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 16:33                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:18                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 18:05                                           ` Al Viro
2012-05-01  4:31                                             ` Al Viro
2012-05-01  5:06                                               ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-01  5:52                                                 ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 17:24                                                   ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 18:30                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:41                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:41                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 18:09                                 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 18:25                                   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120426231942.GJ6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).