From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 05:31:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120501043129.GF6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120429180535.GZ6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 07:05:35PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Looks like, the patch above fixes that.
>
> Yes, found that shortly after posting. No such luck for arm, though...
And for a bunch of other platforms too. Situation right now:
alpha m68k powerpc sparc: do_notify_resume() reached only when returning to
user mode, no check
arm frv x86 mn10300: in current signal.git reached only when returning to
user mode, check removed
xtensa s390: reached only when returning to user mode, check removed
microblaze: in current signal.git reached only when returning to user mode,
check removed; also fixed bogus restart on sigreturn (a-la what had been
fixed on arm a couple of years ago) along with handling of multiple signal
arrivals.
blackfin: no loop (== multiple signals handling is fucked); no check either
ret_from_fork doesn't handle signals, etc., userland or not.
kernel_execve doesn't handle signals, etc., success or no success
conclusion: check is probably not needed, multiple pending signals are
screwed
score: something very fishy there; fixing bogus restart on sigreturn is
simple, but what exactly clears regs->is_syscall on interrupts et.al.?
I don't see anything similar in there. Looks like interrupts could be
confused for syscalls wrt restart logics. And if happens when signal is
pending *and* %r4 contains e.g. -514, we'll get that -514 silently replaced
with -4. Or cp0_epc gets decremented by 8, resulting in a couple of insns
getting repeated... And regs->in_syscall is fairly deep in the stack,
so it doesn't look like it was something zeroed by hardware on interrupt...
What am I missing here?
It gets even funnier - in syscall_trace_enter, after we'd
done do_syscall_trace() we have this:
brl r8
(i.e. the actual call of sys_whatever_it_was()) followed by
li r8, -MAX_ERRNO - 1
sw r8, [r0, PT_R7] # set error flag
neg r4, r4 # error
sw r4, [r0, PT_R0] # set flag for syscall
# restarting
1: sw r4, [r0, PT_R2] # result
j syscall_exit
which looks like a result of severe bitrot. For one thing, regs->regs[0]
is *not* used anywhere in syscall restart logics in arch/score/kernel/signal.c;
for another, the whole thing looks like severely mangled remnants of
if ((unsigned long)r4 >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO) {
regs->regs[7] = 1;
r4 = -r4;
}
regs->regs[4] = r4;
we do on normal (non-traced) syscall path. Unconverted bits and pieces of
mips? There return value does go into regs->regs[2] (and regs->regs[0] is
involved in syscall restart logics, while we are at it). Overall, this
area looks very rotten. BTW, what's the purpose of syscall_exit: there
and why is it different from syscall_return? They seem to be identical
except for stray nop in the beginning of the former. And unless something
very subtle is going on there, that nop *is* a stray one - namely, the
delay slot of immediately preceding "bl schedule_tail"...
Could the maintainers of arch/score tell what's going on?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120420004303.GB6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxQR8g3TycW7nOVjjnnsaWWW-Gh74-bV6rUm+7SRTm25g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120420025438.GD6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFzinX_6DVvDTyxrsP6VEHVY2Q+Y=e+qksnAjR+oT3GZew@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120420080914.GF6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxia+u3VAf0qN-2wv7DyAQZK-Z8=n=cqUvo--+C905aFg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120420160848.GG6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20120420164239.GH6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFzuTspDyyLaOA-g-dTWydaUeeWo9uVGR+rZ=ZJzPW_Ocw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120420180748.GI6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2012-04-23 18:01 ` [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such Al Viro
2012-04-23 18:01 ` Al Viro
2012-04-23 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-24 7:26 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 3:06 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 3:06 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 12:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 12:50 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 13:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 13:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 13:32 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 14:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 16:10 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 17:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 17:51 ` Al Viro
2012-04-26 7:15 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26 7:25 ` David Miller
2012-04-26 13:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 14:31 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26 14:31 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 23:19 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-27 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-27 17:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-02 10:37 ` Matt Fleming
2012-05-02 14:14 ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 14:14 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 18:45 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 19:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-27 19:34 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 22:51 ` Al Viro
2012-04-30 6:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-04-27 19:42 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 20:20 ` Roland McGrath
2012-04-27 21:12 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 21:27 ` Roland McGrath
2012-04-27 23:15 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 23:32 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 4:12 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 4:12 ` Al Viro
2012-04-30 8:06 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-27 23:50 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 18:51 ` [PATCH] arch/tile: avoid calling do_signal() after fork from a kernel thread Chris Metcalf
2012-04-28 20:55 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 20:55 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 21:46 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29 0:55 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 18:51 ` [PATCH v2] arch/tile: fix up some issues in calling do_work_pending() Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29 3:49 ` [PATCH] arch/tile: avoid calling do_signal() after fork from a kernel thread Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29 3:49 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-04-28 2:42 ` [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such Al Viro
2012-04-28 3:32 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 3:36 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 18:05 ` Al Viro
2012-05-01 4:31 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-05-01 5:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-01 5:52 ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 17:24 ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 18:09 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 18:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120501043129.GF6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).