From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:53 -0600 Message-ID: <20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost> References: <1334483574-3997-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown , Linus Walleij Cc: Grant Likely , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze, > > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say. > > That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers > included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually. Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:36844 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761340Ab2ELAJA (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2012 20:09:00 -0400 Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so3683593dad.19 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:08:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h In-Reply-To: <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1334483574-3997-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120416081532.GA3238@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:53 -0600 Message-ID: <20120512000853.A96353E0791@localhost> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Brown , Linus Walleij Cc: Grant Likely , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@lists.openrisc.net, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel Message-ID: <20120512000853.i5369RTPdBtc2h_DV8_6OXLHi9ybcIU0MxPa8ZGFQBs@z> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze, > > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say. > > That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers > included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually. Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.