linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@ti.com,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clkdev: Add default clkdev.h
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 22:05:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120703220512.e03805948e31cfa90778d6c2@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120703114844.GJ29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1149 bytes --]

Hi Mark,

On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:48:44 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>
> > I would definitely prefer being able to just write 
> 
> > generic-y += clkdev.h 
> 
> I agree but I don't see this as something that should block having the
> facility.  Or if it does I guess I'll need to try to either fix clkdev
> to use the arch include optionally or go round all the architectures
> either of which is going to be needlessly painful.

True.

> > Maybe Michal Marek or someone on the kbuild mailing list can help
> > out with a solution for that.
> 
> We could do that incrementally...

Yes, indeed it should be a separate change.

> The reason I'm doing this is that the lack of a widely available clock
> API is a considerable pain point for a lot of the stuff I work on and
> this is the major blocker to just enabling the default implementation on
> architectures that don't support it already which would be a big step
> forwards.

Agreed.  Please submit this patch and we can concentrate on this other
stuff later.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-03 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-02 18:04 [PATCH] clkdev: Add default clkdev.h Mark Brown
2012-07-03  2:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-03 10:12   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 11:16     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 11:48       ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 11:48         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 12:05         ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2012-07-03 12:33           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:15             ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-03 13:15               ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-03 13:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 13:39             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 13:47             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:47               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-09 22:23               ` Mike Turquette
2012-07-09 22:23                 ` Mike Turquette
2012-07-09 23:30                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-09 23:30                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-10 17:22                   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-10 18:07                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-10 18:07                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-11  2:44                       ` Paul Mundt
2012-07-11  2:44                         ` Paul Mundt
2012-07-11  6:32                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-11  6:32                           ` Arnd Bergmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-05  4:04 Mark Brown
2012-08-28 18:56 Mark Brown
2012-08-25 18:16 Mark Brown
2012-07-03 17:04 Mark Brown
2012-07-03 22:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-03 22:07   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-03 15:23 Mark Brown
2012-07-03 15:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-04  8:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-07-04  8:00   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-07-04  9:22   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-04  9:22     ` Mark Brown
2012-06-14 11:22 Mark Brown
2012-06-14 11:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-14 14:19 Mark Brown
2012-05-14 19:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-14 19:09   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120703220512.e03805948e31cfa90778d6c2@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=mturquette@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).