linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to ARM)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:45:49 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120922114549.GA11610@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXVKvaCoJTRb4O+Z4GuifzTEopdcRfRHBahQmpuX+Xi0w@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:56:42PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > That brings up another question though - when was kcmp added to x86, and
> > why aren't we getting notifications from checksyscalls.sh that ARM hasn't
> > been updated?
> >
> > It seems to be that the script was broken, and no one has noticed.
> 
> It seems Heiko did notice: http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,559093
> 
> Now, I'm a bit puzzled by what follows: Heiko proposes a patch to
> ignore sys_kcmp,
> as it's x86-specific, which is acked by Cyrill. Then it suddenly

hpa@ pointed that better approach is to implement kcmp on other archs
after i've acked the patch. so then Heiko provided a patch for s390.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-22 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-22 10:56 sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to ARM) Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-22 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-22 11:45 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2012-09-22 13:20   ` Russell King
2012-09-22 13:20     ` Russell King
2012-09-22 13:38     ` Ralf Baechle
2012-09-22 15:37       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-22 18:47     ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 16:21       ` Mark Salter
2012-09-24 16:21         ` Mark Salter
2012-09-24 16:49         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 17:42           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 18:16             ` Mark Salter
2012-09-24 18:55               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 18:29             ` sys_kcmp Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-24 18:51               ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 20:35                 ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 20:35                   ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 20:44                   ` sys_kcmp Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-24 20:53                     ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120922114549.GA11610@moon \
    --to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).