From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to ARM) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:45:49 +0400 Message-ID: <20120922114549.GA11610@moon> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:63425 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753333Ab2IVLpx (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2012 07:45:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Russell King , Kees Cook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Arch , Heiko Carstens On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:56:42PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Russell King wrote: > > That brings up another question though - when was kcmp added to x86, and > > why aren't we getting notifications from checksyscalls.sh that ARM hasn't > > been updated? > > > > It seems to be that the script was broken, and no one has noticed. > > It seems Heiko did notice: http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,559093 > > Now, I'm a bit puzzled by what follows: Heiko proposes a patch to > ignore sys_kcmp, > as it's x86-specific, which is acked by Cyrill. Then it suddenly hpa@ pointed that better approach is to implement kcmp on other archs after i've acked the patch. so then Heiko provided a patch for s390.