From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:46:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120923004636.GL13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505D9DFB.8080002@westnet.com.au>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:16:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
>
> I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
> if you would rather take it with your changes.
Applied. Other changes since the last update:
* ppc breakage debugged and fixed
* kernel_thread() unified on all converted architectures.
An architecture can add select GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD to its Kconfig
if it's ready to handle that in its copy_thread() - regs will be
NULL, usp - (unsigned long)fn, stck_size - (unsigned long)arg. It
should set things up for ret_from_kernel_thread, so that the sucker
would call given function on given argument. See what e.g. m68k
does in #experimental-kernel_thread() in its copy_thread() and
ret_from_kernel_thread; it's a fairly typical situation if you have
enough callee-saved registers to play with. If not, put these
values somewhere in childregs and pick them in ret_from_kernel_thread -
see i386 for example of that.
Eventually I hope to merge all kernel_thread() instances; then
CONFIG_GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD will be gone. Note, BTW, that having
killed all in-kernel syscalls-via-trap on given architecture we
get a chance to optimize the syscall glue; for instance, on ppc64
we could just go ahead and set stack pointer from %r13->kstack
unconditionally, rather than playing with "if we are coming from
the kernel mode, push stack pointer down by INT_FRAME_SIZE, otherwise
pick it from per-CPU data structure pointed to by r13" as we do now.
And that's just the most obvious bit in the very beginning of their
system_call_common; there's more. I haven't touched that stuff -
this kind of work belongs in architecture trees, not in this series.
FWIW, if we do that conversion for all kernel_thread(), we get another
nice thing pretty much for free - do_fork() won't need pt_regs passed
to it anymore. Note that after that we have two possible values passed
there - NULL (for kernel_thread()) and current_pt_regs() (from sys_fork()
and friends). I.e. it's 1 bit of information, *and* we already have
that bit - it's current->flags & PF_KTHREAD (it's actually a bit more
convenient to check its copy in p->flags). Only kernel threads call
kernel_thread(); only userland processes call sys_fork/sys_clone/sys_vfork().
IOW, all architectures are converted to generic kernel_thread() implementation,
we can
* stop passing pt_regs to do_fork()
* stop passing pt_regs to copy_process()
* stop passing pt_regs to copy_thread() - it can bloody well be
calculated there. And it's not used until that point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-23 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 18:20 [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-07 18:20 ` Al Viro
2012-09-07 18:22 ` Al Viro
2012-09-10 13:40 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-10 16:49 ` Al Viro
2012-09-11 3:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-13 13:27 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-10 22:20 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] c6x: implement ret_from_kernel_execve() and switch to generic kernel_execve() Mark Salter
2012-09-10 22:20 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] c6x: switch to generic sys_execve() Mark Salter
2012-09-17 3:26 ` [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-21 16:26 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread() Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] c6x: switch to generic sys_execve Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-21 18:39 ` [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-22 11:16 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-23 0:46 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-09-23 0:46 ` Al Viro
2012-09-24 10:59 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-17 9:29 ` Michal Simek
2012-09-17 9:29 ` Michal Simek
2012-09-17 22:57 ` Al Viro
2012-09-19 12:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-19 13:32 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120923004636.GL13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=gregungerer@westnet.com.au \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).