From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to ARM)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:55:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120924185546.GJ16532@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348510573.20929.44.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:16:09PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > > #else
> > > > +#define mmap_min_addr 0UL
> > > > #define dac_mmap_min_addr 0UL
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> >
> > I think better to add CONFIG_MMU test here.
>
> Well, my patch was just something quick to get the kernel to build, but
> thinking about it a bit, I still prefer it. The CONFIG_MMU check is in
> security.h already so I think it is less clutter and better for future
> code which may use mmap_min_addr. In any case, the compiler will drop
> any test for "x < 0UL" so the end result is the same.
Well, sure compiler should optimize it out but frankly i prefer #ifdef here.
Anyway, i'm cooking some new patch. Will post once it's ready and tested.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-22 10:56 sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to ARM) Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-22 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-22 11:45 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-22 13:20 ` Russell King
2012-09-22 13:20 ` Russell King
2012-09-22 13:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2012-09-22 15:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-22 18:47 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 16:21 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-24 16:21 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-24 16:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 17:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 18:16 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-24 18:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2012-09-24 18:29 ` sys_kcmp Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-24 18:51 ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 20:35 ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 20:35 ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-09-24 20:44 ` sys_kcmp Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-24 20:53 ` sys_kcmp Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120924185546.GJ16532@moon \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).